Should I Buy to Let?UK property investment calculator

Hypothetical regional comparison

London or a regional city: where might your cash work harder?

A lower-priced property can produce stronger annual cash flow—but location alone never tells you which investment is better.

Two deliberately different properties

AssumptionLondon-style caseRegional-city case
Purchase price£400,000£220,000
Mortgage at 75% LTV£300,000£165,000
Deposit£100,000£55,000
Illustrative tax and buying costs£30,000£15,000
Initial cash required£130,000£70,000
Monthly rent£2,000£1,375
Gross annual rent£24,000£16,500
Gross yield6.0%7.5%

The regional case leaves £60,000 of the original £130,000 uncommitted. That is useful—but it is not a free return. The investor must decide whether to hold it as a reserve, reduce debt, invest elsewhere or consider another property.

Illustrative Year 1 cash flow

London-style caseRegional-city case
Rent collected at 95% occupancy£22,800£15,675
Management£2,280£1,881
Service charge, repairs and other running costs£4,500£3,200
Interest at 5%£15,000£8,250
Pre-tax annual cash flow£1,020£2,344
Cash-on-cash return0.8%3.3%
London-style cash flow£1,020
Regional-city cash flow£2,344
Cash left uncommitted£60,000

Why this is not a verdict on either region

The comparison does not capture local tenant demand, licensing, building condition, lease length, service-charge risk, achievable rent, liquidity or future price changes. A lower-priced property may also require more hands-on management or have concentrated local-employer risk. A London property may have stronger resale liquidity—but that must be tested, not assumed.

Inflation is not one number

Rent, service charge, repairs, insurance and mortgage interest rarely move together. For example, rent growing by 2% does not protect the investor if operating costs grow by 4% and the mortgage later refinances at a higher rate. Model each item separately and use annual overrides for known changes.

A fair comparison uses the same rules

Apply the same tax treatment, holding period, occupancy logic and exit-cost assumptions. Then compare cash flow, cash-on-cash return and IRR—not gross yield alone.

Compare two properties with your own assumptions
About this example

The two property cases use illustrative assumptions rather than current market averages or forecasts.